| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | HP EliteBook 8560w (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1631 |
| Memory | 27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130313 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 07 '17 at 10:30 |
| Run Duration | 97 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
| CPU Throttled | 50% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
39%
Below average
|
31% 46.1 Pts
|
15% 121 Pts
|
9% 145 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
HP(103C 1631) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.51
|
3.45%
Terrible
|
4% 4.25 fps
|
3% 4.33 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mk0400gc TZA 400GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5DV1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
72.2%
Very good
|
100% 448 MB/s
|
64% 21.4 MB/s
|
80% 132 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3
|
39.4%
Below average
|
44% 15.2 GB/s
|
16% 5.77 GB/s
|
31% 127 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EliteBook 8560w Builds (Compare 467 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP EliteBook 8560w
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2820QMIntel $230Bench 59%, 4,929 samples | 91x |
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 77x |
| Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples | 64x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples | 288x |
| Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples | 126x |
| FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples | 47x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $258 |