MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '21 at 21:39
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 61.4
1-Core 88
2-Core 212
64% 120 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 681
70% 566 Pts
64-Core 2,160
134% 2,160 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
MSI(1462 3360) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 145
Parallax 132
106% 136 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 139
Splatting 122
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1413 1666 1674 1667 1655 1613 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 2,177
Write 1,779
Mixed 924
SusWrite 1,615
363% 1,623 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 48.5
160% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 469
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 424
312% 413 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 254%
Great: 353%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
902GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1965 1729 1732 1732 1732 1730 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2006
Write 2,098
Mixed 1,803
SusWrite 1,770
433% 1,919 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 58.3
193% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 427
DQ Mixed 468
350% 467 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 269%
Great: 347%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
17GB free
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 134 126 115 108 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 462
Write 114
Mixed 246
SusWrite 125
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 32.5
107% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 168
150% 228 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 118%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 138 139 139 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 131
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 139
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
850GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 91 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 89.3
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 90.1
65% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
125% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 49.5
MC Mixed 49.8
143% 49.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 20
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $753
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback