| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H67-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110926 |
| Uptime | 16.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 27 '21 at 16:19 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.8%
Good
|
61% 101 Pts
|
26% 196 Pts
|
12% 196 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.1%
Average
|
46% 53.6 fps
|
38% 46 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 194 197 203 202 201 MB/s
|
55%
Above average
|
38% 168 MB/s
|
102% 33 MB/s
|
43% 59.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
37.7%
Below average
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
58% 69.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 397 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 51x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 45x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 42x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 34x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 24x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $224 |