Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150827
Uptime	10.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '17 at 21:14
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 96.4 1-Core 129 2-Core 243 89% 156 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 691 70% 567 Pts	64-Core 673 42% 673 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Gigabyte(1458 3551) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Lighting 42.8 Reflection 38 Parallax 51.8 35% 44.2 fps	MRender 50.8 Gravity 49.9 Splatting 36.4 36% 45.7 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 204GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 31143 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1033 (B1) Unknown 95 95 58 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 50 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 928 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11974346093	83% Excellent	Read 376 Write 262 Mixed 269 67% 302 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 58.7 4K Mixed 31.3 135% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 96.4 114% 201 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 204GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 21404 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 611 (B1) Unknown 96 96 39 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 52 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 563 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5986194934	83.1% Excellent	Read 376 Write 261 Mixed 270 67% 302 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 31.5 136% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 94 112% 199 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12898 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 321 (B1) Unknown 89 89 219 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 54 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 215 (F1) Unknown 99 99 40991253859	90.9% Outstanding	Read 381 Write 310 Mixed 314 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 34.3 155% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 96.9 108% 184 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 115%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 446GB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 758624 (03) Spinup time 93 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 900 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 776239511 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 31096 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 887 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 8590065670 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 65 47 689438755 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 699 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 302572 (C2) HDA temperature 35 53 60129542179 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 26 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -7761005876907 (F1) Unknown 100 253 74369711540 (F2) Unknown 100 253 816979707622	58.7% Above average	Read 102 Write 103 Mixed 96.5 76% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 0.84 4K Mixed 0.18 67% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 96%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 39GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 197 147 7116 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1194 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 47 47 38733 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1186 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 814 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 67 67 401147 (C2) HDA temperature 113 96 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.6% Good	Read 113 Write 112 Mixed 85.9 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.17 68% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 83%
INTEL SS DSC2BF180A4H 180GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 211% 51GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	268% Outstanding	Read 326 Write 96.6 Mixed 181 221% 201 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 10.1 2,580% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 65 DQ Mixed 7.45 2,570% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 268% Great: 268%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB 6,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	84.6% Excellent	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 26.4 85% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 28.7 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 52.5 76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII FORMULA Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA - $284

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	500x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	36x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	60x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	52x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	47x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	23x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	19x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	29x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	23x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $922

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16