Clevo P870DM-G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemClevo P870DM-G  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P870DM-G powered by premamod.com
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161031
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 28 '17 at 19:40
Run Duration340 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 256
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 706
70% 574 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 0871) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 25% Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 595
Write 807
Mixed 558
147% 653 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 19.8
84% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 46.7
DQ Mixed 12.2
16% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 100%
Great: 332%
TDK LoR Micro 8GB
2GB free, PID 0708
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Read 14
Write 3.06
Mixed 3.34
6% 6.79 MB/s
4K Read 4.08
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.005
15% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.7% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 26
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback