Acer Q2900M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAcer Q2900M  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '21 at 06:47
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium J2900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 50.2
32% 45.6 Pts
4-Core 97.5
8-Core 97.5
13% 97.5 Pts
64-Core 96.1
6% 96.1 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0F02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 361.75
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 1.8
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 103 111 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 114
Write 105
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 103
69% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.9% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4.5
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback