| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VS (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120910 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 03 '21 at 19:15 |
| Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.9%
Very good
|
68% 117 Pts
|
48% 353 Pts
|
22% 360 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84B5) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 457.30
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
14% 17.1 fps
|
10% 13.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 56 51 53 50 56 MB/s
|
35.1%
Below average
|
42% 57.5 MB/s
|
118% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 9905403-011.A02LF 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
42.1%
Average
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
38% 13.1 GB/s
|
50% 80.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 377 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 62x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 41x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 54x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $77 |