Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67-M (all builds)
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '21 at 20:26
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 170 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 546 54% 443 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gainward(10B0 1380) 2GB CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Lighting 24 Reflection 20.7 Parallax 23.8 20% 22.8 fps	MRender 28.2 Gravity 25.8 Splatting 19.2 19% 24.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 128GB-$71 1,277 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 360 135 94 87 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 450 Write 387 Mixed 292 SusWrite 192 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 85.7 4K Mixed 31.5 119% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 270 225% 323 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 247GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 74 102 108 79 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 92.6 Write 96.1 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 95.2 55% 75.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 66GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 92 97 95 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 94.9 Write 94.2 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 94 57% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 124GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 113 109 112 114 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 71.7 Write 73.4 Mixed 44.9 SusWrite 112 55% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 101%
asmedia ASMT1153e 4TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 403GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 105 105 108 104 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 50.2 Write 78.6 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 107 105% 72.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 38% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 58%
LaCie Mobile Drive 4TB 108GB free, PID 10bc Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 66 68 70 67 67 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.1% Below average	Read 40.6 Write 55.1 Mixed 49 SusWrite 66.3 75% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.4 156% 1.77 MB/s

H/W JBOD 12TB 6.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 96 95 96 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.5% Good	Read 99.3 Write 99.9 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 96.1 118% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 1.1 396% 4.53 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 10.8 DQ Mixed 0.3 380% 3.9 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 3,072 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 79.6 50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	88x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	75x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	31x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	10x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	10x

RAM
DDR3 1600G 2x4GBUnknownBench 51%, 1,144 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $565

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16