Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP270E4E-K04CL
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130629
Uptime33.8 Days
Run DateApr 23 '21 at 19:33
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 60%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 49.5
2-Core 92.1
42% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 111
19% 135 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03150010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 48 51 52 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 212
Write 59.7
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 52.6
22% 100 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 18.2
53% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 88.1
DQ Write 51.2
DQ Mixed 47.6
41% 62.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 Kingston 99U5582-009.A00G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.1
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback