Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151103
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJul 12 '17 at 23:57
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 131
59% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 282
32% 251 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.5.2
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.6% Average
Lighting 52.5
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 69
43% 61.7 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 52.7
45% 56 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 250GB
190GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 320
Write 244
Mixed 277
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 18.7
67% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 89.7
DQ Mixed 39.2
46% 78.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 72%
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 66% Great: 106%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 110
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.18
64% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
618GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 82.7
Mixed 76.9
63% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.22
67% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 96%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0700
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.3% Average
Read 94.7
Write 94.3
Mixed 96.7
123% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.27
76% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback