Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 14 '17 at 12:59
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 79.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 264
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 714
72% 586 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 368.81
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 76
Reflection 78.7
Parallax 67.4
62% 74 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 73.3
59% 71.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
573GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 409
Mixed 413
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 48.4
176% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 133
141% 234 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
OCZ Trion 100 960GB-$310
485GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 498
Write 151
Mixed 272
67% 307 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 7.39
75% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 31.5
68% 143 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 89%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 397
Mixed 406
97% 438 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 43.9
166% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 113
128% 221 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-065.A00G 9905625-066.A00G 9905625-066.A00G 9905625-065.A00G 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.4% Very good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 23.1
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 21.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $634
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback