Huananzhi X99-TF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHuananzhi X99-TF  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-TF
Memory21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '21 at 22:39
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2649 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 166
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 546
51% 423 Pts
64-Core 1,034
64% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1245 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.2% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 55.8
Parallax 70.1
36% 56.7 fps
MRender 49.5
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 42.9
39% 48.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Patriot Scorch M 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 258 259 262 262 211 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 514
Write 264
Mixed 344
SusWrite 251
76% 344 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 7.4
49% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 123%
MB010000GWAYN 10TB
5TB free
Firmware: HPG5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 44 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 172
Write 44.7
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 44.8
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.1
185% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 134%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.7 7 8 8.5 9.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20.2
Write 1.5
SusWrite 6.9
9% 9.53 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 3.1
121% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 1866 CL10 Series 1600 CL9 Series 1600 CL9 Series 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 18.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-TF Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Huananzhi X99-TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback