Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 11:55
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 173
2-Core 344
110% 204 Pts
4-Core 663
8-Core 1,270
115% 967 Pts
64-Core 3,096
192% 3,096 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 121
Reflection 114
Parallax 128
99% 121 fps
Gravity 106
Splatting 97.9
90% 102 fps
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
646GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1496 1198 1205 1201 1209 1208 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,537
Write 2,371
Mixed 1585
SusWrite 1,253
433% 1,937 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 67.8
222% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 612
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 615
463% 617 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 275%
Great: 372%
Samsung 840 250GB
33GB free
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 272 269 227 227 228 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 459
Write 328
Mixed 388
SusWrite 266
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 30.9
108% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 97.8
88% 132 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 295 296 297 297 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 458
Write 415
Mixed 371
SusWrite 311
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 33
111% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 120
99% 138 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 124%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
579GB free
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 388 389 394 395 267 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 314
Write 372
Mixed 317
SusWrite 371
78% 343 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 18.6
78% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 61.8
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 31.7
50% 91.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
655GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 88 88 88 87 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 86.6
64% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 101%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
585GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 114 121 117 121 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 119
Write 110
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 119
69% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 77.2
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 43.2
155% 54.3 GB/s
SC Read 32.8
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 41.8
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 144%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,462
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback