Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '21 at 05:07
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$40
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 191
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 284
37% 277 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Nvidia(10DE 080A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.6 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KINGSTON 240GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 28 12 26 124 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32% Below average
Read 161
Write 91
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 61.2
22% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 11.3
44% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 110
105% 164 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
118GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 121 124 125 120 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 122
Write 111
Mixed 67
SusWrite 122
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
18GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.2 1.3 2 1.8 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 1.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 2.2
8% 8.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $207
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback