| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 7.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160125 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 23 '17 at 12:54 |
| Run Duration | 502 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76.6%
Very good
|
74% 129 Pts
|
54% 402 Pts
|
24% 392 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
7.39%
Terrible
|
0% 18.2 fps
|
22% 27.1 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
39.7%
Below average
|
38% 13.5 GB/s
|
33% 11.4 GB/s
|
52% 76.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,078 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 314x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $219Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 182x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $71Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 145x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 125x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 110x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 85x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 30% - Below average | Total price: $542 |