Zotac XXXXXX

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Zotac XXXXXX (all builds)
Motherboard	ZOTAC XXXXXX
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151103
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '17 at 03:40
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3150 3,131 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	29.1% Poor	Memory 47 1-Core 16.6 2-Core 35.7 24% 33.1 Pts	4-Core 67.1 8-Core 67.9 9% 67.5 Pts	64-Core 67.8 4% 67.8 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Zotac(19DA B301) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 2.77 Parallax 2.59 1% 2.29 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 4.22 3% 3.01 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee 32GB SSD 31GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0213E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 75 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 642 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 158 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 11 (A4) Unknown 100 100 651612 (A5) Unknown 100 100 342 (A6) Unknown 100 100 290 (A7) Unknown 100 100 319 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 34 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 50 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 5790351 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 66614 (F2) Unknown 100 100 62843	28% Poor	Read 302 Write 76.1 Mixed 101 35% 160 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 2.29 38% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 15.6 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 2.27 5% 11 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 35%
JMicron Generic DISK00 500GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 354GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 113 Write 108 Mixed 91.5 132% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.39 75% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 51%
JMicron Generic DISK01 250GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 232GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 130 Write 135 Mixed 103 156% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.59 60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37635 38920 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.8% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 8.1 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical XXXXXX Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Zotac XXXXXX

CPU
Celeron N3150IntelBench 26%, 3,131 samples	19x
Core i7-4770RIntelBench 72%, 317 samples	14x
Core i5-4570RIntelBench 65%, 1,007 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	21x
Iris Pro HD 5200 (V1 Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 6%, 1,166 samples	16x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x

SSD
Ultra Plus 256GBSanDisk $139Bench 81%, 17,545 samples	4x
SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GBKingston $100Bench 67%, 901 samples	2x
M500 480GBCrucial $84Bench 83%, 9,168 samples	2x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 65%, 318 samples	3x
99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 26%, 6,120 samples	2x
9905469-157.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 22%, 198 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $139

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16