Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 84 2-Core 150 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 382 40% 321 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740 30,433 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gigabyte(1458 36FF) 2GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	8.04% Terrible	Lighting 8.7 Reflection 12 Parallax 13.3 7% 11.3 fps	MRender 13.7 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 10.7 10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.04% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256 256GB 572 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10D SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 125 184 163 162 163 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.9% Average	Read 161 Write 145 Mixed 151 SusWrite 161 35% 154 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 21.8 86% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 111 92% 135 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B5773DH0-YK0 2x2GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	50% Average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 10.3 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16