Asus CG8565

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus CG8565  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8565
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120104
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 06 '21 at 17:54
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 94.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 540
55% 445 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Sapphire(174B 0640) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 8.3
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 9
Splatting 7.4
6% 8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 52 43 55 19 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 131
Write 115
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 48.4
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
297GB free
Firmware: 3.AAJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 73 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 71.3
Write 46.2
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 77.5
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
USB Flash DISK 32GB
9GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.9 8.4 7.5 7.6 8.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 5.5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 8.5
14% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-MGJHB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.6% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 3R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 24% 45 113 74 70 0" 1280 1024
History: Score 29: 3R 4G 2B | Score 29: 3R 3G 5B
Typical CG8565 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Asus CG8565

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $525
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback