Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 18:56
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 79%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 79
2-Core 152
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 137
22% 157 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Sapphire(174B 2438) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.2% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 65.4
56% 68.3 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 58.1
Splatting 63.4
51% 62.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 22 19 5.1 18 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 333
Write 264
Mixed 155
SusWrite 19.3
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 10.7
50% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 50.8
DQ Mixed 23.8
22% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
125GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 67 67 67 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 97.5
Write 86.3
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 65.8
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL7-7-7 DDR3-1333 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 6R 6G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 59% 32 108 7 60 21.5" 1920 1080 BNQ78B7 BenQ G2255
History: Score 25: 1R 4G 8B | Score 31: 2R 3G 12B | Score 55: 6R 6G 7B
Typical Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $521
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback