Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 08:54
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 129
60% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 364
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 370
Sapphire(174B E270) 2GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 41.3
30% 37.3 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 23.5
22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27%
Great: 30%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Outton MK-500 120G 120GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 271 259 278 279 180 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.9% Good
Read 336
Write 270
Mixed 288
SusWrite 252
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 14.9
95% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 27.5
54% 107 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 73%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
466GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 144 144 144 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 41.9
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 144
72% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 77%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 16GB
2GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 116
Write 37.2
Mixed 41.2
68% 65 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.6
75% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.2% Average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.9
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 23" 1280 720 GSM59C6 LG MONITOR
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback