Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H110M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '21 at 23:15
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	SLV-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 70.5 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 192 68% 121 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 345 44% 334 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.57% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 4.5 4% 4.43 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.57% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB 3,843 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 219 330 184 339 257 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 287 Write 183 Mixed 179 SusWrite 261 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 30.9 4K Mixed 16.7 50% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 264 186% 241 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 119GB free Firmware: 1H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 103 103 103 103 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 79.4 Write 78 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 103 58% 78.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 350GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 171 174 175 172 173 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 138 Write 106 Mixed 82.6 SusWrite 173 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 14GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 14 16 16 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 78.6 Write 14.7 Mixed 28 SusWrite 15.4 36% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4-2400 CL16 8GB 04CD F4-2800C17-8GVR 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.1% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 22.1 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	40"	1280 720	SAM0C39 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	720x
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	479x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	305x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	453x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	392x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	252x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	267x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	131x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	128x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $123

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16