Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 56.4 1-Core 80.9 2-Core 162 55% 99.6 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 617 56% 468 Pts	64-Core 1,574 97% 1,574 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB Ram: 3GB, Driver: 311.66 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Lighting 14.4 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 17.2 12% 15.2 fps	MRender 18.7 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 17 15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 464 Mixed 497 110% 493 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 30.8 107% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 133 126% 196 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 124%
LSI Logical Volume 598GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 467GB free Firmware: 3000 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 150 Write 133 Mixed 133 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 5.61 4K Mixed 1.27 289% 2.65 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 135%
Inateck FE2005 1TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 253GB free, PID 2590 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 197 Write 135 Mixed 156 199% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 1.07 84% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 125GB 732 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 110GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	7.45% Terrible	Read 13.5 Write 6.93 Mixed 8.97 12% 9.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.59 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.61 68% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.45% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ... 128GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	69.6% Good	MC Read 34.8 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 23.4 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.7 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16