Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 23:03
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 257
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 794
81% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,004
62% 1,004 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.4% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 98.9
84% 99.6 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 93.8
Splatting 87.1
79% 98.4 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 429 428 423 428 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 387
Mixed 330
SusWrite 414
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 40.7
141% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 288
231% 327 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 461 461 467 474 428 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 478
Mixed 434
SusWrite 454
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 50.5
167% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 367
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 116%
Great: 128%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 134 133 134 132 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 114
Write 117
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 131
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 84%
WD WD7500AACS-00D6B0 750GB
124GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 40.2
Write 42.5
Mixed 35
SusWrite 46.7
30% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 46%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
56GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 35 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 272
Write 34.2
Mixed 58
SusWrite 34.4
96% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 4.9
852% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.7
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 5.6
896% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 33.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 30
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 4R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 24% 34 109 8 144 27" 1463 823 AOC2701 Q27G1WG4
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $678
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback