HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150713
Uptime12.5 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 16:08
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 165
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 281
37% 277 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 4
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 80 63 47 38 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 374
Write 229
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 100
39% 180 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 10 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
407GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 97 98 97 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 98.7
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 96.8
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 33.2
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 11.3
20% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.6
195% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 92%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
50GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 11 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 35
Write 29.8
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 10.9
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 20%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
141GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 11 10 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 30.4
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 11
32% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-YK0 M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.9% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24.1" 1280 720 ENC2646 CS240
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $141
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback