PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds) |
Memory | 23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20201204 |
Uptime | 4.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 08 '21 at 20:40 |
Run Duration | 606 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
91.3%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
Gigabyte(1458 2318) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.7.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
574GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 753 101 135 105 101 102 MB/s
|
167%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD80EDAZ-11TA3A0 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 121 125 127 126 127 MB/s
|
91.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD80EDAZ-11TA3A0 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 152 157 155 151 147 MB/s
|
||||
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 54 54 55 53 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 51 54 54 55 54 MB/s
|
62.9%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 54 55 55 53 MB/s
|
40.5%
Average
|
|||
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 160 161 162 163 MB/s
|
67.8%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD40 EMRX-82UZ0N0 4TB
659GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 73 72 72 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
TOSHIBA MG03ACA400 4TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 151 146 147 147 MB/s
|
57.1%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
468GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 73 72 72 MB/s
|
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 140 139 138 140 MB/s
|
60.6%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
646GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 38 38 44 MB/s
|
35.8%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 38 38 44 MB/s
|
37%
Below average
|
|||
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
411GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 74 75 76 88 MB/s
|
43.4%
Average
|
|||
WDC WD10 EURX-63UY4Y0 1TB
573GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 127 138 138 137 MB/s
|
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 25 24 24 24 MB/s
|
35.6%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
4TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 25 24 24 24 MB/s
|
44.1%
Average
|
|||
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 25 24 24 26 MB/s
|
43.1%
Average
|
|||
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 72 74 71 71 71 MB/s
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
37% | 12% | 75 | 337 | 270 | 60 | 69.5" | 1536 864 | ONK1080 AV Receiver |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 4,661x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $170Bench 98%, 128,080 samples | 4,294x |
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 3,429x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 2,248x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 2,084x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,473x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $850 |