Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateSep 07 '21 at 02:11
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 748
72% 594 Pts
64-Core 874
54% 874 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.1% Above average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 86.4
51% 70.4 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 46.2
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 255GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 260 268 281 302 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 542
Write 249
Mixed 294
SusWrite 275
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 21.5
79% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 116
99% 149 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 199%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 250 241 235 250 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 455
Write 430
Mixed 172
SusWrite 246
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 1.2
8% 3.67 MB/s
DQ Read 6.1
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 7.8
6% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 392%
Amd-raid WDS100T1X0E-00AF 1TB
668GB free
Firmware: 6111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2183 2169 2082 1218 1220 1136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1,698
Write 2,167
Mixed 1,790
SusWrite 1,668
414% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 66.6
214% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 707
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 725
544% 723 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 269%
Great: 481%
ST2000DL 001-9VT156 2TB
351GB free, PID 0198
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 80 79 79 79 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31% Below average
Read 84.2
Write 89.3
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 80
94% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 25.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM587E IPS235
Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $532
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback