Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 154%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive360% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '21 at 06:01
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 762
79% 638 Pts
64-Core 781
48% 781 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
EVGA(3842 4897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 286
Reflection 240
Parallax 279
234% 269 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 230
Splatting 166
185% 236 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 194%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1055 1673 1919 1948 1966 1944 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 2,621
Write 2,086
Mixed 1,482
SusWrite 1,751
444% 1,985 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 82.7
287% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,462
DQ Write 1,236
DQ Mixed 1,312
993% 1,337 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 360%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB
301GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 491 491 490 492 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 488
Mixed 393
SusWrite 490
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 63.7
217% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
111GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 152 151 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 454
Mixed 357
SusWrite 187
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.1
198% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 354
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 108%
Great: 116%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
138GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2198 2192 2047 1878 1537 1326 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,186
Write 2,192
Mixed 1,412
SusWrite 1863
430% 1,913 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 39.1
231% 90.8 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 1,000
DQ Mixed 1,254
862% 1,056 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 311%
Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$83
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 24.1
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 26.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 6R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 56% 27 112 8 144 27" 1920 1080 AUS27AF VG278
Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback