PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus Z10PA-D8 Series (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK Z10PA-D8 Series |
Memory | 119.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190823 |
Uptime | 10.8 Days |
Run Date | Sep 11 '21 at 14:44 |
Run Duration | 267 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
49.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.68
|
131%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
NE-256 256GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 309 268 177 219 249 MB/s
|
65.5%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
127GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 297 297 296 296 296 MB/s
|
87.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Asgard AN1024NVMe-M.2/80 1TB
342GB free
Firmware: R0802C0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 334 539 789 1490 1485 MB/s
|
140%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
503GB free
Firmware: 7113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 149 157 156 155 MB/s
|
79%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
45% | 22% | 86 | 274 | 188 | 144 | 31.5" | 2560 1440 | AOC3220 AG322QWG4 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v31stBench 67%, 867 samples | 13x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v31stBench 68%, 414 samples | 8x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v41stBench 71%, 283 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 11x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 9x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $485 |