bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	83% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	X99-D3
Memory	113 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191031
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '21 at 08:40
Run Duration	354 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 143 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 74 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 171 63% 110 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 696 59% 507 Pts	64-Core 1,707 106% 1,707 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3703) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 112 Parallax 100 84% 105 fps	MRender 94.7 Gravity 102 Splatting 98 80% 98.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB 87,883 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 674 527 539 424 138 378 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	154% Outstanding	Read 1,287 Write 773 Mixed 1,069 SusWrite 447 199% 894 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 53 158% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 689 DQ Write 437 DQ Mixed 330 309% 485 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 277%
LSI Logical Volume 596GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 255GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 222 256 230 222 247 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.6% Good	Read 425 Write 320 Mixed 291 SusWrite 238 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 24.9 80% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 284 210% 277 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 75%
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB 3,259 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 873GB free Firmware: S4500104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 418 429 429 421 421 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 431 Mixed 386 SusWrite 425 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 35.2 117% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 274 225% 322 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 131%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 210GB free Firmware: 8101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 57 11 33 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 38 Write 26.1 SusWrite 35.6 7% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 24.9 85% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 83.7 DQ Write 90.1 DQ Mixed 54.7 50% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 139 133 133 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 143 Write 144 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 136 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 108%
ASMT 2105 1TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 615GB free, PID 5136 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 115 139 131 122 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 241 Write 228 Mixed 214 SusWrite 128 269% 203 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 17.6 1,507% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 18.4 DQ Write 30.4 DQ Mixed 22.5 1,868% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 172%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 138 131 128 134 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 130 Write 75.7 Mixed 92.5 SusWrite 131 142% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 68% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M386A4G40DM0-CPB 2x31.5GB 254 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	60.5% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 18.2 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 15.5 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 92.6 43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 6: 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	40%	10	106	6	60	42.5"	3072 1728	ACR06C5 DM431K

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,023x
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,568x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	933x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,141x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	822x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	456x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16