Asus P7H55-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '17 at 09:43
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 188
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 246
33% 246 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Asus(1043 836D) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.53
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.5% Above average
Read 263
Write 171
Mixed 164
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 23.9
104% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 38.5
62% 120 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HDN726050ALE6100 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: APGN Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 171
Mixed 155
126% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 4.22
4K Mixed 0.43
170% 1.91 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
991GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 150
Mixed 143
115% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.28
84% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
757GB free
Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 123
Write 148
Mixed 148
106% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
372GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 88.4
Mixed 87
68% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.29
86% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 60%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB
23GB free, PID 00ad
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 105
Write 18.3
Mixed 20.1
44% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.26
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.69
81% 2.95 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.4% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 15.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M PRO Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $326
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback