Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '21 at 01:42
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	79%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 76.2 2-Core 139 52% 90.9 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 359 40% 317 Pts	64-Core 386 24% 386 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	8.85% Terrible	Lighting 9.9 Reflection 60.9 Parallax 20.9 8% 30.6 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 14.8 Splatting 12.4 10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.85% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 125 118 113 118 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 614 Write 140 Mixed 230 SusWrite 121 60% 276 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 16.7 65% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 396 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 209 173% 255 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 153%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 218GB free Firmware: GG2OACA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 99 96 92 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 92.1 Write 91.2 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 93.4 57% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 16GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.5% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 22.2 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 14.4 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 16: 3R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
16%	14%	28	105	2	144	15.5"	1536 864	NCP004D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,846x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	985x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,368x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	951x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	511x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,163x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	409x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	592x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16