Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 14:03
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 77.7
36% 57.1 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 487
39% 343 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 63.5
Parallax 52.2
46% 57.5 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 49.9
39% 47.8 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 714 682 615 546 491 492 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 836
Write 939
Mixed 822
SusWrite 590
180% 797 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 24.9
77% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 426
316% 417 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 112%
Great: 181%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
472GB free
Firmware: R0817B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 227 18 211 15 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 412
Write 365
Mixed 337
SusWrite 152
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 17.2
75% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 33.6
68% 135 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 101%
Jmicron Tech 1TB
131GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 77 70 70 71 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 74.3
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 71.9
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 76%
Apple HD D HTS547575A 750GB
512GB free
Firmware: JE4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 83 86 86 85 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
Read 82.3
Write 82.1
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 84.4
53% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK CT8G4SFS8266.M8FJ 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 26.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 16.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 1R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 10% 31 38 5 60 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 11: 1R 2G 0B
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback