Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 145 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 512 48% 401 Pts	64-Core 1,040 64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 250GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.52 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44% Average	Read 249 Write 177 Mixed 204 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 1.47 62% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 73.8 76% 124 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 100%
LaCie Rugged FW USB3 1TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 6GB free, PID 1061 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 28.9 Write 23.7 Mixed 25.4 33% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.31 37% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12x4GB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 12 of 18 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	53.3% Above average	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 19.9 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 7.3 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56451stBench 59%, 1,766 samples	13x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples	6x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	6x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	7x
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $54Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	4x
THNSNJ400PCSZ 400GBToshibaBench 94%, 56 samples	4x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16