Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Extreme  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 17:43
Run Duration372 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 41.1
2-Core 88.2
46% 69.6 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 210
24% 187 Pts
64-Core 217
14% 217 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 27
Parallax 31.9
18% 27.2 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 25.2
24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.2
Write 171
Mixed 139
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 22.8
81% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 90.8
DQ Mixed 26.7
29% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 192 195 196 196 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 148
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 193
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 32GB
29GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 13 12 13 10 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 7.7
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 11.6
16% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL7-2GBRM F3-12800CL7-2GBRM F3-12800CL7-2GBRM F3-12800CL7-2GBRM 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 11.3
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 8.4
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 4R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 9% 134 276 198 60 34.8" 1360 768 HKC0000 HKC TV
History: Score 33: 4R 3G 4B | Score 45: 4R 5G 10B | Score 20: 1R 3G 6B | Score 35: 2R 6G 7B | Score 39: 5R 1G 11B | Score 34: 4R 3G 5B
Typical Crosshair IV Extreme Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $573
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback