Dell Precision WorkStation T5500

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T5500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0D883F
Memory	21.7 GB free of 36 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181015
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '21 at 15:22
Run Duration	9717 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5620 3,527 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 60.6 2-Core 131 56% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 317 34% 268 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 2920) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 0.9 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.8 1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 1%
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 11E6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.9 Reflection 5.7 Parallax 15 13% 12.2 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 17.7 Splatting 16.1 11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 670GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 186 184 192 181 205 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.3% Good	Read 241 Write 233 Mixed 231 SusWrite 188 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 31.9 96% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 198 149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 207GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 189 188 198 185 211 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.7% Good	Read 233 Write 232 Mixed 230 SusWrite 192 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 34.3 104% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 24GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 189 188 153 109 99 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60% Above average	Read 231 Write 234 Mixed 218 SusWrite 154 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 33.3 103% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 198 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 134%
Seagate Portable 5TB 3,819 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 598GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8 8.1 8.4 8.3 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 24.6 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 8.2 16% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.4 130% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 67%
Lacie P9227 Mobile 4TB 565 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 997GB free Firmware: 1153 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.2 8.2 8 8.3 8.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 29 Write 26.7 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 8.2 17% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.8 188% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 69%
Lacie P9227 Mobile 4TB 565 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2.5TB free Firmware: 1153 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.2 7.9 8.3 8.3 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 27 Write 26.4 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 8.2 16% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.4 135% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 69%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB 1,520 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 91GB free, PID 6124 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	9.28% Terrible	Read 21.4 Write 12.2 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 3.7 16% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 9.28% Great: 79%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 61GB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.21% Terrible	Read 19.9 Write 12.2 Mixed 14.9 SusWrite 3.7 16% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.21% Great: 19%
Samsung G3 Station 1.5TB 635 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 373GB free, PID 6013 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8 8 8 8.1 8.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 17.4 Mixed 27.1 SusWrite 8 26% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 20%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB 1,520 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 520GB free, PID 6124 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	8.95% Terrible	Read 14.9 Write 12.2 Mixed 13.9 SusWrite 3.7 14% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 8.95% Great: 79%
ST2000DL 001-9VT156 2TB 180 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 76GB free, PID 1053 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 12.2 Mixed 13.9 SusWrite 3.8 15% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 36GB 1,968 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 9.1 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision WorkStation T5500 Builds (Compare 1,578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T5500

CPU
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	120x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	84x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	82x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	74x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	31x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	246x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	119x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	117x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16