Toshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13F

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13F (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA VG10S
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130925
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '21 at 09:24
Run Duration	296 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 90.1 1-Core 75.5 2-Core 139 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 160 18% 142 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M 15,605 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Toshiba(1179 FA47) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	6.11% Terrible	Lighting 7.4 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 9.5 6% 9.37 fps	MRender 4.8 Gravity 8 Splatting 9.3 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.11% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$109 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 519GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 73 73 63 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 453 Write 76.4 Mixed 111 SusWrite 71.3 38% 178 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 66.4 4K Mixed 21.7 90% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 73.8 DQ Mixed 106 84% 121 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 128%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 703GB free Firmware: 1405 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.4 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	4.72% Terrible	Read 36.6 Write 33.1 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 3.7 6% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 0.9 10% 4.1 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 10 DQ Mixed 1 2% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.72% Great: 29%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 955GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.4 3.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 27.4 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 3.6 16% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.6 179% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 955GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.76% Terrible	Read 28.9 Write 26.1 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 3.6 15% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.6 185% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 13,194 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: 0737 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.4 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 33 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 3.6 19% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 0.6 208% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 103%
Seagate OneTouch HDD 4TB 352 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 478GB free Firmware: 1707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 40 37 31 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 31.9 Write 26.2 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 37.3 23% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.5 182% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 71%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 477GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.3 3.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 29.7 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 3.6 29% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 372GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.2 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 34.3 Write 28.2 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 3.5 28% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 44%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB 1,289 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 181GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.2 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 35 Write 28.5 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 3.6 29% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 22%
WD 6400AAK External 640GB 252 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 201GB free, PID 1001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.2 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 30.7 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 3.7 30% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 10,168 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.1% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 18.9 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 4: 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
4%	6%	36	24	10	60	15.5"	1536 864	AUO30ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE P50-A-13F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13F

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	7x

GPU
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	4x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	3x

SSD
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	2x
External USB 3.0 4TBIntensoBench 22%, 43 samples	2x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 10,168 samples	5x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	1x
SODIM DDR3 1600 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 363 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $318

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16