Supermicro X10DAx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory112GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 112GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X10DAx  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DAX
Memory103.8 GB free of 112 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display7680 x 4320 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161005
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateAug 22 '17 at 03:56
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 833
74% 628 Pts
64-Core 2,677
166% 2,677 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 189
Parallax 166
132% 172 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 167
Splatting 122
111% 137 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 120%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Promise Pegasus2 R8 21TB
14.5TB free
Firmware: 0504
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
2TB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
426% Outstanding
Read 4,984
Write 2,889
Mixed 2,937
794% 3,603 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 36.7
116% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 402
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 139
152% 259 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 426%
Great: 302%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
2TB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
404% Outstanding
Read 4,521
Write 2,828
Mixed 2,876
753% 3,408 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 36.8
117% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 398
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 145
153% 257 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 404%
Great: 302%
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
228GB free
Firmware: Ba Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 520
Write 263
Mixed 197
72% 327 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 17
70% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 64.5
89% 161 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 89%
RED Media 960GB
225GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.8% Very good
Read 372
Write 421
Mixed 399
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 26.4
82% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 74
74% 118 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 75%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 973GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,074
Write 854
Mixed 729
196% 885 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 18.3
59% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 111
121% 202 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 124%
Great: 308%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
4.5TB free
Firmware: AR17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965600-033.A00G 9965662-012.A01G 9965600-033.A00G 9965662-016.A00G 9965600-033.A00G 9965662-012.A01G 9965662-012.A01G 112GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 33.9
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10DAx Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

System: Supermicro X10DAx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $501
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback