Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A79XTD EVO (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100617
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '17 at 23:37
Run Duration	449 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 635 5,306 User benchmarks, average bench 45% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 40.9 2-Core 84.6 42% 65.4 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 144 21% 152 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3614) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 38.3 28% 34.3 fps	MRender 39.9 Gravity 40.5 Splatting 34 31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB-$503 3,421 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: M311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6718 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 582 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (B5) Unknown 253 253 0 (B6) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 0 77312688162 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 88 88 13 (EA) Unknown 100 100 155124 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9897 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6657 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 34562	37.3% Below average	Read 202 Write 197 Mixed 163 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 13.3 51% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 58.8 DQ Mixed 14 18% 31 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 21.8 Write 20.9 Mixed 11.2 22% 18 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.45 88% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 49%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 695GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 21.6 Write 21.4 Mixed 9.87 22% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.16 49% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HM641JI 640GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 596GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 21.9 Write 21 Mixed 21.4 28% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.25 46% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 17%
SAMSUNG SP2504C 250GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 215GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.7% Very poor	Read 21.1 Write 20.5 Mixed 19.8 26% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.37 48% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 28%
WDC WD80 0JD-75MSA3 80GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 74GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.4% Very poor	Read 21.5 Write 21.2 Mixed 17.4 25% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.43 67% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 15%
WDC WD80 0JD-75MSA1 80GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 69GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.7% Very poor	Read 21.5 Write 20.5 Mixed 15.2 24% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.36 58% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% null MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.9% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.1 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 7.6 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	26x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	26x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	12x

GPU
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	13x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
C300-CTFDDAC128M 128GBCrucialBench 47%, 288 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	27x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	14x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $111

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16