Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-5005U 50,603 User benchmarks, average bench 38% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 54.9 1-Core 48.2 2-Core 72.2 37% 58.4 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 161 21% 157 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 920M 11,731 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 105E) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	4.68% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 7.2 5% 7.7 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 6.7 5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.68% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PH6-CE480-L2 480GB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: F/W:1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 181 156 94 59 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 362 Write 218 Mixed 261 SusWrite 117 53% 240 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 23.4 86% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 15.2 76% 171 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P2 1315 CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.8% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 9.7 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 6.5 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	353x
GeForce 920MNvidiaBench 5%, 11,731 samples	163x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	118x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P2 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 1,759 samples	116x
8KTF51264HZ-1G9N1 1x4GBMicronBench 31%, 1,166 samples	65x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	55x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16