ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory	7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201015
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '21 at 15:47
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3 1,745 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 101 2-Core 201 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 775 70% 589 Pts	64-Core 1,331 82% 1,331 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 3102) CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.8 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 20.9 18% 20.4 fps	MRender 25.2 Gravity 23.2 Splatting 16.9 17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NT-256 256GB 1,342 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117D SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 447 447 446 420 211 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 461 Mixed 423 SusWrite 404 99% 437 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 40.5 151% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 232 176% 233 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 100%
Mass Storage Device 1GB 1GB free, PID 125b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.3 6.4 6.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.78% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 6.2 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 6.3 10% 8.38 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.63 MB/s

Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB 635 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1603 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	3.99% Terrible	Read 12.7 Write 2.2 Mixed 4 SusWrite 2.4 6% 5.32 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.99% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CPB 3x4GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	MC Read 40.5 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 29.1 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 18.7 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback