Alienware Aurora R12

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora R12  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07W25T
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210923
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 23:32
Run Duration464 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900F-$240
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 55
1-Core 38
2-Core 75.7
36% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 250
23% 195 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Dell(1028 3907) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 138
Reflection 188
Parallax 204
112% 177 fps
Gravity 153
Splatting 136
127% 145 fps
Poor: 135% Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC711 SK hynix 1TB
583GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41001131 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 992 1129 1182 1147 905 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,898
Write 1,670
Mixed 1,358
SusWrite 1,073
336% 1,500 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 44.6
140% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 294
223% 301 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 199%
Great: 370%
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 1TB
507GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 285 307 324 320 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 227
Write 216
Mixed 251
SusWrite 294
56% 247 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 20.7
70% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 124
92% 121 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54%
Great: 133%
0 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 90%
1 1TB
880GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 90%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 181 165 165 145 180 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 169
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 173
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 130%
ST320LT0 07-9ZV142 320GB
297GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 100 99 104 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.9% Average
Read 114
Write 83.9
Mixed 42
SusWrite 98.8
109% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 43%
MTFDDAK2 56MAY-1AH12ABHA 256GB
238GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 100 101 100 105 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
111% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 219
Mixed 186
SusWrite 99.7
234% 173 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 14.1
1,180% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 30.3
DQ Mixed 19.3
1,743% 21.6 MB/s
TOSHIBA MK7559GSXP 750GB
697GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 99 100 101 101 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 0.5
Write 97.1
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 94.4
77% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.9
97% 0.95 MB/s
ST4000LM 024-2AN17V 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 12 4.7 4.2 4 4.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 80.3
Write 102
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 6.3
81% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
158% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 59%
WDC WD10 EADS-11M2B2 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 100 94 99 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 92
Write 96.5
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 99.2
122% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown X2YH1K-MIE-NX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22.9
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R12 Builds (Compare 2,135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R12

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $899
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback