Asus P5KPL-AM SE

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P5KPL-AM SE (all builds)
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081030
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '21 at 16:23
Run Duration	681 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 66.4 1-Core 30.2 2-Core 55.4 35% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 122 16% 118 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.11.3 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 15.5 Reflection 26.8 Parallax 21.7 13% 21.3 fps	MRender 26.7 Gravity 15.3 Splatting 24.5 18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 72 74 84 65 46 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38% Below average	Read 208 Write 195 Mixed 181 SusWrite 69.5 37% 163 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 21.7 74% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 35.2 DQ Write 78.8 DQ Mixed 47.7 39% 53.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 124%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 223GB free Firmware: S1Z4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22% Poor	Read 90.8 Write 59.8 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 17.1 13% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 11.1 52% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.8 DQ Write 49 DQ Mixed 21 21% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 100%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40 2,820 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 54GB free Firmware: 5.0.7b SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 95 86 94 79 71 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32% Below average	Read 156 Write 148 Mixed 144 SusWrite 87.9 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 16.2 58% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 84.2 DQ Mixed 33.3 32% 48.3 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 80%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 229GB free Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 59.1 Write 54.2 Mixed 38.9 SusWrite 27.1 33% 44.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 35%
Maxtor 6 Y080M0 82GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 55GB free Firmware: YAR5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 38 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 16.8 22% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 32%
Maxtor 6 V250F0 251GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 234GB free Firmware: VA11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	28% Poor	Read 69.4 Write 53.3 Mixed 40.2 SusWrite 26.8 35% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.4 161% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 39%
SanDisk SDSSDP128G 128GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 87GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 18 13 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 47.6 Write 21.6 Mixed 43.1 SusWrite 13.9 40% 31.5 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 4.6 203% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 116%
ASMT 2115 500GB 2,879 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 45GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 51 53 52 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Read 75.5 Write 72.7 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 50.9 79% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 166%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.9 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 0.8 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KPL-AM SE Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM SE

CPU
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	34x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	31x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	30x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	41x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	34x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	315x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	37x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16