HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87C3
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 12:46
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 79.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 264
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 977
93% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,444
89% 1,444 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
HP(103C 8702) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 112
Parallax 128
103% 122 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 114
Splatting 104
106% 134 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GB
281GB free
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 747 731 747 740 747 746 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,227
Write 1,252
Mixed 1,122
SusWrite 743
244% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 73.4
255% 95.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,097
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 995
741% 987 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 217%
Great: 219%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
513GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 72 45 105 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 37.9
Write 55.2
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 74.6
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
336GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 180 182 183 181 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 131
Write 107
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 180
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
113% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 90%
HGST 1TB
839GB free, PID 1014
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 39 40 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 36.8
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 38.1
50% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 43%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 38.8
Write 34.7
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 4.3
34% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 48%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 130 130 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 122
Write 128
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 130
163% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 58%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 37
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 7.4
34% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 62%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
281GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 32.9
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 1.4
33% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 77%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 35 34 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 39
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 34.1
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8ME-8XR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 32.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 35
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $504
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback