Lenovo 27561R6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 27561R6 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	14.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130227
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '17 at 22:40
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 200 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 485 52% 411 Pts	64-Core 488 30% 488 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510 2,450 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1466 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 353 (64) Unknown 100 100 6042528 (65) Unknown 100 100 1253472 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 7 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 94 94 1833 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1404 (B7) Unknown 98 98 29 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 29 100 171799871517 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 94 94 6 (E9) Unknown 100 100 11230 (EA) Unknown 100 100 7002 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9046 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3527 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	55.3% Above average	Read 484 Write 170 Mixed 125 56% 260 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 11 67% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 27.9 51% 101 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 88%
JMicron 1TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 64GB free, PID 2561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 65.9 Write 136 Mixed 17 97% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 9.27 4K Mixed 0.37 331% 3.49 MB/s	DQ Read 1.12 DQ Write 4.73 DQ Mixed 0.66 188% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 4x8GB 300 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.3% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.5 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 17.8 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 27561R6

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)