Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	16.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140116
Uptime	12 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '21 at 17:29
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	EST-User
Background CPU	73%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$186 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 5.9 GHz, turbo 6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	37.2% Below average	Memory 51.8 1-Core 58.2 2-Core 92.1 41% 67.4 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 198 20% 160 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.9% Poor	Lighting 30.6 Reflection 45.1 Parallax 34.2 25% 36.6 fps	MRender 34.4 Gravity 56.4 Splatting 42.8 36% 44.5 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 149 152 155 160 156 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.4% Below average	Read 152 Write 163 Mixed 155 SusWrite 150 35% 155 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 14 46% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 29.6 DQ Write 54.9 DQ Mixed 38 30% 40.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 102GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 179 141 129 121 108 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31% Below average	Read 174 Write 172 Mixed 206 SusWrite 136 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 11.4 43% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 36.5 DQ Write 72.5 DQ Mixed 36 33% 48.3 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 115%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB 12,882 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 427GB free Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 155 153 157 165 166 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.5% Poor	Read 172 Write 161 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 154 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 0.7 26% 9.77 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 28.2 DQ Mixed 0.8 8% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 99%
Sony QD-G64E 60GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 55GB free, PID 0c55 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 117 119 126 134 135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 188 Write 129 Mixed 143 SusWrite 120 189% 145 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 4.2 285% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6P1 4x8GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 11.5 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.6 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	350x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	168x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	123x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	96x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	59x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	23x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	34x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	12x
99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 6,486 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $424

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $157	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16