Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210407
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '22 at 06:59
Run Duration	411 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 66.3 1-Core 142 2-Core 268 85% 159 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 850 83% 680 Pts	64-Core 1,353 84% 1,353 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.5% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 109 Parallax 100 83% 104 fps	MRender 95.6 Gravity 101 Splatting 98.6 81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 88%
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Gigabyte(1458 2313) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.3 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	100% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 145 Parallax 195 103% 155 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 136 Splatting 97.3 94% 118 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164 35,257 User benchmarks, average bench 314% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,160 Write 1,801 Mixed 2,012 444% 1,991 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 71.1 229% 81.4 MB/s	DQ Read 737 DQ Write 530 DQ Mixed 607 461% 625 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 472%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$38 78,255 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 0GB free Firmware: P3CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 724 Write 180 Mixed 489 102% 464 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 34.2 119% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 87.5 DQ Write 55 DQ Mixed 66 51% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 242%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 959GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 69.5 Write 119 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 0.8 90% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 0.8 431% 4.4 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 10.6 DQ Mixed 1 396% 4 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 92%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 97GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 63.1 Write 30.2 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 1.2 42% 35.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 13% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 48%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 496GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 88.7 Write 91.9 Mixed 77.9 SusWrite 0.8 83% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 56%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 141 154 153 158 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 135 Write 108 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 153 162% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 62%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 715GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.7 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 150 Write 155 Mixed 82.8 SusWrite 0.8 121% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 67%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 600GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 15 21 22 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 122 Write 105 Mixed 75.6 SusWrite 20.1 101% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 48%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 108 108 108 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 92.8 Write 120 Mixed 94.6 SusWrite 108 145% 104 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.6 213% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 74%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 6TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 108 108 108 108 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 80.2 Write 128 Mixed 84.9 SusWrite 108 142% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 0.8 316% 3.3 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 11.9 DQ Mixed 0.8 433% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB 2,853 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	62.6% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 24.1 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 20.6 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,655x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,266x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,416x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,239x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,078x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,471x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,836x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	771x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	726x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,033

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16