Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	55 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '22 at 12:12
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 81.5 1-Core 145 2-Core 287 93% 171 Pts	4-Core 561 8-Core 978 93% 769 Pts	64-Core 1,445 89% 1,445 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.2% Poor	Lighting 36.9 Reflection 40.8 Parallax 37.9 30% 38.5 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 27.1 27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 694 96 73 18 8.3 178 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,305 Write 1,075 Mixed 862 SusWrite 178 190% 855 MB/s	4K Read 52.6 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 64.9 220% 74.8 MB/s	DQ Read 632 DQ Write 683 DQ Mixed 271 311% 529 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 255%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 931GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2386 2202 1506 1517 1498 1533 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	332% Outstanding	Read 2,558 Write 2,295 Mixed 1,819 SusWrite 1,774 474% 2,111 MB/s	4K Read 60.9 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 80.5 264% 90.4 MB/s	DQ Read 998 DQ Write 768 DQ Mixed 913 675% 893 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 332% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 956GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 188 189 189 183 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 150 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 186 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 784GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 149 148 148 148 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 151 Write 136 Mixed 77.1 SusWrite 147 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 109%
Toshiba MK2565GSXN 250GB 654 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 182GB free Firmware: GH101M SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 72 72 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 68 Write 71.6 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 71.5 44% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 40%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 58GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 3.7 14 10 7.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 25.5 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 9.2 28% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.2 84% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139 14,506 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	85% Excellent	MC Read 32.5 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 33.7 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 34.8 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	396x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16