HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	14.9 GB free of 20.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180305
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '22 at 11:48
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	KEN-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3565 7,121 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 65.2 2-Core 144 54% 92.6 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 294 34% 266 Pts	64-Core 279 17% 279 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.8% Poor	Lighting 34.7 Reflection 39.4 Parallax 37.2 28% 37.1 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 26.5 27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB 2,367 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1127B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 20 14 30 22 1.7 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29% Poor	Read 195 Write 26.6 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 19.3 14% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 15.2 49% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 71 DQ Mixed 1.8 30% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 98%
Tph00802000gb 0 2TB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 223GB free Firmware: JKAOA36C SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 74 67 67 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 56.1 Write 70.3 Mixed 40.1 SusWrite 69.5 43% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 146% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 71%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 38GB free Firmware: 3.ADG SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 73 71 69 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 56.8 Write 53.1 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 71 40% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 106GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 88 87 86 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 84.9 Write 90.4 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 87 58% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 70%
Toshiba MG03ACA100 1TB 1,552 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 16GB free Firmware: FL1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 98 92 92 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 95.4 Write 89.6 Mixed 46.7 SusWrite 93.3 59% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:85 9B CT102464BD160B.M16 ID:85 9B CT102464BD160B.M16 ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 54GB 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.13 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 5.1 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	535x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	488x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	273x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	156x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16