| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME B350-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170605 |
| Uptime | 4.2 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 19 '22 at 20:41 |
| Run Duration | 219 Seconds |
| Run User | NOR-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.7%
Very good
|
73% 130 Pts
|
62% 511 Pts
|
46% 736 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.8%
Above average
|
52% 75.5 fps
|
52% 63.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
80% 360 MB/s
|
98% 34.7 MB/s
|
102% 167 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
21GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 131 127 134 106 125 MB/s
|
73.4%
Very good
|
84% 114 MB/s
|
133% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD2 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
56.4%
Above average
|
58% 20.2 GB/s
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
43% 92.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,312 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 979x |
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 420x |
| Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 389x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 492x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 304x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 279x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $443 |