| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| System | HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3397 |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120507 |
| Uptime | 9 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 01 '22 at 20:25 |
| Run Duration | 243 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.3%
Good
|
64% 107 Pts
|
42% 319 Pts
|
20% 315 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 550-$79
MSI(1462 8A90) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.1.1
|
5.87%
Terrible
|
0% 16.3 fps
|
17% 21 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 42 42 39 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
42% 56.5 MB/s
|
167% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28%
Poor
|
25% 8.77 GB/s
|
25% 8.8 GB/s
|
55% 73.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,420 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 2,470x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,468x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 799x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 1,924x |
| HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 727x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 490x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |